Re: [PATCH]AArch64: relax cbranch tests to accepted inverted branches [PR113502]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:40 AM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Richard Biener writes: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> > >> Tamar Christina writes: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > Recently something in the midend had started inverting the branches by > >> >

Re: [PATCH]AArch64: relax cbranch tests to accepted inverted branches [PR113502]

Richard Biener writes: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Tamar Christina writes: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Recently something in the midend had started inverting the branches by >> > inverting >> > the condition and the branches. >> > >> > While this is fine, it

Re: [PATCH]AArch64: relax cbranch tests to accepted inverted branches [PR113502]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Tamar Christina writes: > > Hi All, > > > > Recently something in the midend had started inverting the branches by > > inverting > > the condition and the branches. > > > > While this is fine, it makes it hard to actually test. In

Re: [PATCH]AArch64: relax cbranch tests to accepted inverted branches [PR113502]

Tamar Christina writes: > Hi All, > > Recently something in the midend had started inverting the branches by > inverting > the condition and the branches. > > While this is fine, it makes it hard to actually test. In RTL I disable > scheduling and BB reordering to prevent this. But in GIMPLE

[PATCH]AArch64: relax cbranch tests to accepted inverted branches [PR113502]

Hi All, Recently something in the midend had started inverting the branches by inverting the condition and the branches. While this is fine, it makes it hard to actually test. In RTL I disable scheduling and BB reordering to prevent this. But in GIMPLE there seems to be nothing I can do.