On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com writes:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com writes:
Index:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com writes:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(revision 203267)
+++
Hi,
bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com writes:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(revision 203267)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(working copy)
@@ -2037,12 +2037,12 @@
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com writes:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(revision 203267)
+++
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-outside-loop-use-1.c: New test.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Bin.Cheng
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1
/tree-ssa/ivopts-outside-loop-use-1.c: New test.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Bin.Cheng
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013
computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com
wrote:
I don't think you need
.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Bin.Cheng
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote
On 10/18/2013 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 203267)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c (working copy)
@@ -7270,8 +7270,8 @@ fold_plusminus_mult_expr (location_t loc, enum tre
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 10/18/2013 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c (revision 203267)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c (working copy)
On 10/18/2013 02:10 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 10/18/2013 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 10/18/2013 02:10 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 10/18/2013 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Bin.Cheng
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
I don't think you need
+ /* Sign extend off if expr is in type which has lower precision
+ than HOST_WIDE_INT. */
+ if
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
I don't think you need
+ /* Sign extend off if expr is in type which
Sorry that I don't understand tree type system well, so here are two
more questions, could you please explain little bit more? Thanks very
much.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Fri
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
I don't think you need
+ /* Sign extend off if expr is in type which has lower precision
+ than HOST_WIDE_INT. */
+ if
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Oleg Endo
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:41 AM
To: Richard Biener
Cc: Bin Cheng; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
After
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of bin.cheng
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 1:07 PM
To: 'Richard Biener'
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: RE: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
-Original Message
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:31 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:31 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix computation of offset in ivopt
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote
Hi,
This patch fix two minor bugs when computing offset in IVOPT.
1) Considering below example:
#define MAX 100
struct tag
{
int i;
int j;
}
struct tag arr[MAX]
int foo (int len)
{
int i = 0;
for (; i len; i++)
{
access arr[i].j;
}
}
Without this patch, the offset computed by
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fix two minor bugs when computing offset in IVOPT.
1) Considering below example:
#define MAX 100
struct tag
{
int i;
int j;
}
struct tag arr[MAX]
int foo (int len)
{
int i = 0;
for (; i len;
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 12:31 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fix two minor bugs when computing offset in IVOPT.
1) Considering below example:
#define MAX 100
struct tag
{
int i;
int j;
}
struct
29 matches
Mail list logo
