RE: [PATCH]middle-end: add additional runtime test for [PR113467]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > Ok for master? > > > > I think you need a lp64 target check for the large constants or > > alternatively use uint64_t? > > > > Ok, how about this one. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with -m32,-m64 and no issues. > > Ok for master? OK >

RE: [PATCH]middle-end: add additional runtime test for [PR113467]

> > Ok for master? > > I think you need a lp64 target check for the large constants or > alternatively use uint64_t? > Ok, how about this one. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with -m32,-m64 and no issues. Ok for master? Thanks, Tamar gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR

Re: [PATCH]middle-end: add additional runtime test for [PR113467]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Tamar Christina wrote: > Hi All, > > This just adds an additional runtime testcase for the fixed issue. > > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. > > Ok for master? I think you need a lp64 target check for the large constants or alternatively use

[PATCH]middle-end: add additional runtime test for [PR113467]

Hi All, This just adds an additional runtime testcase for the fixed issue. Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. Ok for master? Thanks, Tamar gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/113467 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_110-pr113467.c: New