RE: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex numbers

2021-06-22 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Richard Biener > > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 1:08 PM > > To: Tamar Christina > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > > Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp:

RE: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex numbers

2021-06-22 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 1:08 PM > To: Tamar Christina > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex > numbers > > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Tamar

Re: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex numbers

2021-06-22 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > Hi Richi, > > [...] > > since we are removing the TWO_OPERANDS node we need to drop one of the > > multiply > > and so we need to give it the original 2 vectors as a parameter. The > > current > >

Re: [PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex numbers

2021-06-22 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > Hi Richi, > > This patch is still very much incomplete and I do know that it is > missing things but it's complete enough such that examples are working > and allows me to show what I'm working towards. > > note, that this approach will remove a

[PATCH]middle-end[RFC] slp: new implementation of complex numbers

2021-06-21 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches
Hi Richi, This patch is still very much incomplete and I do know that it is missing things but it's complete enough such that examples are working and allows me to show what I'm working towards. note, that this approach will remove a lot of code in tree-vect-slp-patterns but to keep the diff