On 2017-07-07 18:04, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Great! Would you mind to apply the patch for us? The only person here
with write access just went on vacation. I have submitted a new version
(v4) with the change that applies to both main and 7.
OK, will do.
Thanks!
--
Daniel Cederman
Cobham
> Great! Would you mind to apply the patch for us? The only person here
> with write access just went on vacation. I have submitted a new version
> (v4) with the change that applies to both main and 7.
OK, will do.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 2017-07-07 12:01, Eric Botcazou wrote:
We can drop the define if necessary, but we would like to keep the two
flags. Would that be OK to apply?
Yes, OK to apply on mainline and 7 branch with this change, thanks.
Great! Would you mind to apply the patch for us? The only person here
with
> We can drop the define if necessary, but we would like to keep the two
> flags. Would that be OK to apply?
Yes, OK to apply on mainline and 7 branch with this change, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 04/07/17 15:38, Daniel Cederman wrote:
On 2017-06-30 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/06/17 18:05, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Cederman
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:15:43 +0200
I'm not thrilled with this, it's undocumented, the other workaround
don't have
On 2017-06-30 07:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/06/17 18:05, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Cederman
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:15:43 +0200
I'm not thrilled with this, it's undocumented, the other workaround
don't have
it and I don't think that we really need it.
On 29/06/17 18:05, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Cederman
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:15:43 +0200
I'm not thrilled with this, it's undocumented, the other workaround
don't have
it and I don't think that we really need it.
The B2BST errata workaround requires more
From: Daniel Cederman
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:15:43 +0200
>> I'm not thrilled with this, it's undocumented, the other workaround
>> don't have
>> it and I don't think that we really need it.
>
> The B2BST errata workaround requires more changes to assembler
> routines
Hello Eric,
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
Let's forget -mfix-gr712rc for now, -mfix-ut700 is enough I think.
I think it would be confusing to use the -mfix-ut700 flag when compiling
for the GR712RC. Now when we are not using a generic name for the errata
workaround we should at least
> This patch adds a workaround to the Sparc backend for the LEON3FT
> store-store errata. It is enabled when using the -mfix-ut699,
> -mfix-ut700, or -mfix-gr712rc flag.
Let's forget -mfix-gr712rc for now, -mfix-ut700 is enough I think.
> The workaround inserts NOP instructions to prevent the
This patch adds a workaround to the Sparc backend for the LEON3FT
store-store errata. It is enabled when using the -mfix-ut699,
-mfix-ut700, or -mfix-gr712rc flag.
The workaround inserts NOP instructions to prevent the following two
instruction sequences from being generated:
std ->
11 matches
Mail list logo