Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-08-01 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 13 July 2017 at 10:46, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 24 June 2017 at 19:23, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just doing an update of the patch series, rebased against trunk, and >> applied changes as requested by every comment so far. >> >> Notes on

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-07-13 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 24 June 2017 at 19:23, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Hi, > > Just doing an update of the patch series, rebased against trunk, and > applied changes as requested by every comment so far. > > Notes on changes have been made on each patch where applicable. > Hi, So what would be

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/13/2017 02:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford >>> wrote:

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-12 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 13 June 2017 at 01:22, Mike Stump wrote: > On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is >> there in reviewing the other patches? > >> Maybe people who

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-12 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 12 June 2017 at 20:34, Richard Sandiford wrote: > [Disclaimer: I can't approve any of this :-)] > > Iain Buclaw writes: >> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license. >> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation. >>

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-12 Thread Mike Stump
On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > I'm not sure who this is a question to really, but how much value is > there in reviewing the other patches? > Maybe people who know the > frontend interface well could comment on that part, but would

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
[Disclaimer: I can't approve any of this :-)] Iain Buclaw writes: > 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license. > 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation. > 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons). > 004 - The front-end (GDC)

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-06-06 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 29 May 2017 at 22:57, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> The upstream DMD compiler that comprises all components of the >> standalone part is now implemented in D programming language itself. >> However here GDC is still using the C++ implementation, it is a future >> goal to

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-05-29 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The upstream DMD compiler that comprises all components of the > standalone part is now implemented in D programming language itself. > However here GDC is still using the C++ implementation, it is a future > goal to switch to being a self-hosted compiler minus the GCC binding > interface

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-05-28 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 28 May 2017 at 22:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 28 May 2017 at 15:30, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> --- >> >> Iain Buclaw (13): >> 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license. >> 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation. >> 003

Re: [PATCH 0/13] D: Submission of D Front End

2017-05-28 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 28 May 2017 at 15:30, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > --- > > Iain Buclaw (13): > 001 - The front-end (DMD) language implementation and license. > 002 - The front-end (GDC) implementation. > 003 - The front-end (GDC) changelogs (here be dragons). > 004 - The front-end