On 11/13/19 10:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/7/19 3:50 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Thanks for your detailed reply Martin. You'll find my reply inline.
Since you added Nick Clifton to
On 11/14/19 2:15 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/13/19 8:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/13/19 2:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
As Nick also mentioned many times, -grecord-gcc-switches is in DWARF
and this causes a great disadvantage: it gets stripped out.
>>>
>>> Well, that's still
On 11/13/19 8:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/13/19 2:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
As Nick also mentioned many times, -grecord-gcc-switches is in DWARF
and this causes a great disadvantage: it gets stripped out.
Well, that's still something I disagree. I bet RedHat is similarly to
openSUSE also
On 11/6/19 10:21 AM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following patches which introduce a compile
> option --record-gcc-command-line. When passed to gcc, it saves the command
> line option into the produced object file. The option makes it trivial to
> trace
On 11/13/19 2:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> As Nick also mentioned many times, -grecord-gcc-switches is in DWARF
>> and this causes a great disadvantage: it gets stripped out.
>
> Well, that's still something I disagree. I bet RedHat is similarly to
> openSUSE also building all packages with a
On 11/7/19 4:13 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Egeyar,
Thanks for including me in this discussion.
This option is similar to -frecord-gcc-switches.
For the record I will also note that there is -fverbose-asm which
does almost the same thing, but only records the options as comments
in the
On 11/7/19 3:50 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Thanks for your detailed reply Martin. You'll find my reply inline. Since you
added Nick Clifton to your following reply, I am adding him to this
On 11/7/19 4:13 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Egeyar,
Thanks for including me in this discussion.
This option is similar to -frecord-gcc-switches.
For the record I will also note that there is -fverbose-asm which
does almost the same thing, but only records the options as comments
in the
Hi Egeyar,
Thanks for including me in this discussion.
>>> This option is similar to -frecord-gcc-switches.
For the record I will also note that there is -fverbose-asm which
does almost the same thing, but only records the options as comments
in the assembler. They are never converted into
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Thanks for your detailed reply Martin. You'll find my reply inline.
Since you added Nick Clifton to your following reply, I am adding him to
this email too. He is not only the author of
+ adding the author of Annobin to the email thread
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
a) it does not print per function options, which can be modified with
__attribute__ (or pragma):
Compiler is aware of the information (and uses it in inlining (or ICF) for
instance):
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
I would like to propose the following patches which introduce a compile option
--record-gcc-command-line. When passed to gcc, it saves the command line option
into the produced object file. The option makes it trivial to trace back
Hello,
I would like to propose the following patches which introduce a compile option
--record-gcc-command-line. When passed to gcc, it saves the command line option
into the produced object file. The option makes it trivial to trace back how a
file was compiled and by which version of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
