Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various i18n fixes (and questions)

2017-03-10 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, David Malcolm wrote: > However, we're deep in stage 4 of the development cycle. Looking at > our development plan > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html > it's not clear to me how such changes fit into our schedule: the plan > seems to make no mention of how i18n and

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various i18n fixes (and questions)

2017-03-09 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, David Malcolm wrote: > However, we're deep in stage 4 of the development cycle. Looking at > our development plan > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html > it's not clear to me how such changes fit into our schedule: the plan > seems to make no mention of how i18n and translation

[PATCH 0/7] Various i18n fixes (and questions)

2017-03-09 Thread David Malcolm
Roland Illig [CCed] recently filed numerous issues within our Bugzilla instance relating to i18n. In general, the issues look valid to me, so I've attempted to fix some of them in the following patch kit. However, we're deep in stage 4 of the development cycle. Looking at our development plan