On 28/09/2020 10:09, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), to avoid a useless indirection when
> building the address of a symbol, we want to consider SYMBOL_REF as a
> legitimate constant. This way, we build the address using a series of
> upper/lower
ping?
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 10:30, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:09, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), to avoid a useless indirection when
> > building the address of a symbol, we want to consider SYMBOL_REF as a
> > legitimate
ping?
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:09, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), to avoid a useless indirection when
> building the address of a symbol, we want to consider SYMBOL_REF as a
> legitimate constant. This way, we build the address using a series of
> upper/lower
With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), to avoid a useless indirection when
building the address of a symbol, we want to consider SYMBOL_REF as a
legitimate constant. This way, we build the address using a series of
upper/lower relocations instead of loading the address from memory.
This patch also
