Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

Hi, Thanks for the finding. I will fix it in next upcoming patches. Thanks, Cupertino Shung-Hsi Yu writes: > Hi, > > Thanks for working on the BPF backend! > > I noticed a tiny typo while test compiling libbpf-tools[1]. (Have yet look > into the cause of failure in detail though) > > On Thu,

Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

Hi, Thanks for working on the BPF backend! I noticed a tiny typo while test compiling libbpf-tools[1]. (Have yet look into the cause of failure in detail though) On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 10:54:31AM +0100, Cupertino Miranda wrote: > [snip] > + > +pack_type_fail: > + bpf_error_at

Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

Pushed to upstream master. Thanks ! Jose E. Marchesi writes: > Ok. > Thanks! > >> From fda9603ded735205b6e20fc5b65a04f8d15685e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Cupertino Miranda >> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:22:48 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: Imp

Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

Ok. Thanks! > From fda9603ded735205b6e20fc5b65a04f8d15685e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Cupertino Miranda > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:22:48 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins > > This patch updates the support for the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

> Jose E. Marchesi writes: > >>> This patch updates the support for the BPF CO-RE builtins >>> __builtin_preserve_access_index and __builtin_preserve_field_info, >>> and adds support for the CO-RE builtins __builtin_btf_type_id, >>> __builtin_preserve_type_info and __builtin_preserve_enum_value.

Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

>From fda9603ded735205b6e20fc5b65a04f8d15685e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cupertino Miranda Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:22:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins This patch updates the support for the BPF CO-RE builtins __builtin_preserve_access_in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

>> + /* FIXED: This wat not Ok. > > Hm? If that is fixed, do we still need that comment? :) Touche! ;) > >> +emit_insn ( \ >> + gen_mov_reloc_coredi (reg, \ >> +gen_rtx_CONST_INT (Pmode, 0), \ >> +

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

Jose E. Marchesi writes: >> This patch updates the support for the BPF CO-RE builtins >> __builtin_preserve_access_index and __builtin_preserve_field_info, >> and adds support for the CO-RE builtins __builtin_btf_type_id, >> __builtin_preserve_type_info and __builtin_preserve_enum_value. >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

> This patch updates the support for the BPF CO-RE builtins > __builtin_preserve_access_index and __builtin_preserve_field_info, > and adds support for the CO-RE builtins __builtin_btf_type_id, > __builtin_preserve_type_info and __builtin_preserve_enum_value. > > These CO-RE relocations are now

[PATCH 1/2] bpf: Implementation of BPF CO-RE builtins

This patch updates the support for the BPF CO-RE builtins __builtin_preserve_access_index and __builtin_preserve_field_info, and adds support for the CO-RE builtins __builtin_btf_type_id, __builtin_preserve_type_info and __builtin_preserve_enum_value. These CO-RE relocations are now converted to