On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/3/7 16:53, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
> >> Unfortunately this change (flag_test_coverage -> !optimize ) caused hundred
> >> of gfortran cases execution failure with O0. Take gfortran.dg/index.f90
> >>
On 2023/3/7 16:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Xionghu Luo wrote:
Unfortunately this change (flag_test_coverage -> !optimize ) caused hundred
of gfortran cases execution failure with O0. Take gfortran.dg/index.f90 for
example:
.gimple:
__attribute__((fn spec (". ")))
void
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/3/6 16:11, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:22 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2023/3/2 18:45, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
> small.gcno: 648: block 2:`small.c':1, 3, 4, 6
>
On 2023/3/6 16:11, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:22 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2023/3/2 18:45, Richard Biener wrote:
small.gcno: 648: block 2:`small.c':1, 3, 4, 6
small.gcno: 688:0145: 36:LINES
small.gcno: 700:
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:22 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/3/2 18:45, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>small.gcno: 648: block 2:`small.c':1, 3, 4, 6
> >>small.gcno: 688:0145: 36:LINES
> >>small.gcno: 700: block 3:`small.c':8, 9
>
On 2023/3/2 18:45, Richard Biener wrote:
small.gcno: 648: block 2:`small.c':1, 3, 4, 6
small.gcno: 688:0145: 36:LINES
small.gcno: 700: block 3:`small.c':8, 9
small.gcno: 732:0145: 32:LINES
small.gcno: 744:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:22 AM Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/3/2 16:41, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:31 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> When spliting edge with self loop, the split edge should be placed just
> >> next to
> >> the edge_in->src,
On 2023/3/2 16:41, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:31 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
When spliting edge with self loop, the split edge should be placed just next to
the edge_in->src, otherwise it may generate different position latch bbs for
two consecutive self
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:31 AM Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> When spliting edge with self loop, the split edge should be placed just next
> to
> the edge_in->src, otherwise it may generate different position latch bbs for
> two consecutive self loops. For details, please refer to:
>
When spliting edge with self loop, the split edge should be placed just next to
the edge_in->src, otherwise it may generate different position latch bbs for
two consecutive self loops. For details, please refer to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93680#c4
Regression tested pass on
10 matches
Mail list logo