Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

On 1/9/23 00:57, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' defined variables. This change is in the context of the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

On 1/19/23 02:59, Cupertino Miranda wrote: Hi Jeff, Kindly calling your attention to this thread. Sorry, just crazy busy around here. Jeff

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

Hi Jeff, Kindly calling your attention to this thread. Regards, Cupertino Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes: > Richard Biener writes: > >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

Richard Biener writes: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' >> > defined variables. >> > This change is in the context of

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 7:07 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' > > defined variables. > > This change is in the context of the bugzilla #170181. > > > >

Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

PING PING Cupertino Miranda writes: > Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes: > >> gentle ping >> >> Cupertino Miranda writes: >> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> First of all thanks for your quick review. >>> Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox. >>> On 12/2/22 10:52,

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes: > gentle ping > > Cupertino Miranda writes: > >> Hi Jeff, >> >> First of all thanks for your quick review. >> Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox. >> >>> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

gentle ping Cupertino Miranda writes: > Hi Jeff, > > First of all thanks for your quick review. > Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox. > >> On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

Hi Jeff, First of all thanks for your quick review. Apologies for the delay replying, the message got lost in my inbox. > On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' >> defined variables. >> This change is in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote: Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' defined variables. This change is in the context of the bugzilla #170181. gcc/ChangeLog: v850.c(v850_select_section): Changed function. I'm not sure this is

[PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.

Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile' defined variables. This change is in the context of the bugzilla #170181. gcc/ChangeLog: v850.c(v850_select_section): Changed function. --- gcc/config/v850/v850.cc | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git