Mailing list got lost somewhere, Archiving OK.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:52 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: jeffreya...@gmail.com; rguent...@suse.de; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] middle-end Teach CSE to be
Hi Jeff & Richard,
> If you can turn that example into a test, even if it's just in the
> aarch64 directory, that would be helpful
The second patch 2/2 has various tests for this as the cost model had to
be made more accurate for it to work.
>
> As mentioned in the 2/2 thread, I think we
Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
> index
> 330c1e90ce05b8f95b58f24576ec93e10ec55d89..d76e01b6478e22e9dd5760b7c78cecb536d7daef
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/cse.c
> +++ b/gcc/cse.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
>
On 8/31/2021 7:29 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
This patch gets CSE to re-use constants already inside a vector rather than
re-materializing the constant again.
Basically consider the following case:
#include
#include
uint64_t
test (uint64_t a, uint64x2_t b, uint64x2_t* rt)
{
Hi All,
This patch gets CSE to re-use constants already inside a vector rather than
re-materializing the constant again.
Basically consider the following case:
#include
#include
uint64_t
test (uint64_t a, uint64x2_t b, uint64x2_t* rt)
{
uint64_t arr[2] = { 0x0942430810234076UL,
