On 11 March 2017 11:28:46 CET, Roland Illig wrote:
>Am 10.03.2017 um 05:12 schrieb Martin Sebor:
>> I have just an observation/question here for future consideration.
>> If this sort of diagnostic is common (I count 23 instances of it)
>> or if it is expected to become
Am 10.03.2017 um 05:12 schrieb Martin Sebor:
> I have just an observation/question here for future consideration.
> If this sort of diagnostic is common (I count 23 instances of it)
> or if it is expected to become common, would it make sense to add
> a directive for it to the pretty printer to
On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 21:12 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 10:45 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > PR driver/79875
> > * opts.c (parse_sanitizer_options): Add missing question mark
> > to
> > "did you mean" message.
> > ---
> > gcc/opts.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:45:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> PR driver/79875
> * opts.c (parse_sanitizer_options): Add missing question mark to
> "did you mean" message.
> ---
> gcc/opts.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
On 03/09/2017 10:45 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR driver/79875
* opts.c (parse_sanitizer_options): Add missing question mark to
"did you mean" message.
---
gcc/opts.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR driver/79875
* opts.c (parse_sanitizer_options): Add missing question mark to
"did you mean" message.
---
gcc/opts.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c
index 8274fab..6ea57af 100644
--- a/gcc/opts.c