On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
`0On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:58:06PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 05/17/2011 11:31 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On 05/10/2011 04:18
`0On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:58:06PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 05/17/2011 11:31 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On 05/10/2011 04:18 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On 03/10/2011 11:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
After all
On 05/10/2011 04:18 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On 03/10/2011 11:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
After all that, we can finally make tree_exp inherit from typed_tree.
Quite anticlimatic.
Ping. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00559.html
Ping^2.
-Nathan
On 03/10/2011 11:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
After all that, we can finally make tree_exp inherit from typed_tree.
Quite anticlimatic.
Ping. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00559.html
-Nathan
After all that, we can finally make tree_exp inherit from typed_tree.
Quite anticlimatic.
-Nathan
gcc/
* tree.h (struct tree_exp): Inherit from struct typed_tree.
* tree.c (initialize_tree_contains_struct): Mark TS_EXP as TS_TYPED
instead of TS_COMMON.
diff --git
