Hi Carl,
on 2024/5/25 04:18, Carl Love wrote:
> Kewen:
>
> On 5/14/24 01:43, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on 2024/4/20 05:17, Carl Love wrote:
>>> rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in
>>>
>>> The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed
>>> built-in that is
Kewen:
On 5/14/24 01:43, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on 2024/4/20 05:17, Carl Love wrote:
>> rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in
>>
>> The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed
>> built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws
>> b
Hi,
on 2024/4/20 05:17, Carl Love wrote:
> rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in
>
> The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed
> built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws
> built-in is not documented and there are no test cases
rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in
The built-in __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws is a duplicate of the vec_signed
built-in that is documented in the PVIPR. The __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws
built-in is not documented and there are no test cases for it.
This patch removes the redundant built-in.