Re: [PATCH 2/2][AArch64] Add missing support for poly64x1_t

2016-09-19 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:22:39PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote: > Hi, > > > On 19 September 2016 at 10:39, Tamar Christina > wrote: > > > > > > On 17/09/16 07:20, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > > > > Hi James, > > > >> The convention when fixing a bugzilla is to place

Re: [PATCH 2/2][AArch64] Add missing support for poly64x1_t

2016-09-19 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, On 19 September 2016 at 10:39, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > On 17/09/16 07:20, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > Hi James, > >> The convention when fixing a bugzilla is to place a line in your ChangeLog >> which looks like: >> >> PR component/x > > Oh, I

Re: [PATCH 2/2][AArch64] Add missing support for poly64x1_t

2016-09-19 Thread Tamar Christina
On 17/09/16 07:20, James Greenhalgh wrote: Hi James, The convention when fixing a bugzilla is to place a line in your ChangeLog which looks like: PR component/x Oh, I wasn't aware of this, thanks! I'll add it. FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vdup-vmov.c -O0

Re: [PATCH 2/2][AArch64] Add missing support for poly64x1_t

2016-09-17 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:54:15PM +0100, Tamar Christina wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch adds the following NEON intrinsics to the ARM Aarch64 GCC > (and fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758): > > Added new tests for these and ran regression tests on