On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 17:22, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
> On 28/09/2020 10:09, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), we can use small offsets with
> > upper/lower relocations to avoid the extra addition of the
> > offset.
> >
> > This patch accepts
On 28/09/2020 10:09, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), we can use small offsets with
> upper/lower relocations to avoid the extra addition of the
> offset.
>
> This patch accepts expressions symbol+offset as legitimate constants
> when the literal pool is
ping?
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 10:30, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:09, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), we can use small offsets with
> > upper/lower relocations to avoid the extra addition of the
> > offset.
> >
> > This patch
ping?
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:09, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), we can use small offsets with
> upper/lower relocations to avoid the extra addition of the
> offset.
>
> This patch accepts expressions symbol+offset as legitimate constants
> when the literal pool
With -mpure-code on v6m (thumb-1), we can use small offsets with
upper/lower relocations to avoid the extra addition of the
offset.
This patch accepts expressions symbol+offset as legitimate constants
when the literal pool is disabled, making sure that the offset is
within the range supported by
