Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: Add documentation of which operand matches the mode of the standard pattern name [PR113508]

2024-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:16 AM Andrew Pinski wrote: > > In some of the standard pattern names, it is not obvious which mode is being > used in the pattern > name. Is it operand 0, 1, or 2? Is it the wider mode or the narrower mode? > This fixes that so there is no confusion by adding a

[PATCH 2/2] doc: Add documentation of which operand matches the mode of the standard pattern name [PR113508]

2024-02-14 Thread Andrew Pinski
In some of the standard pattern names, it is not obvious which mode is being used in the pattern name. Is it operand 0, 1, or 2? Is it the wider mode or the narrower mode? This fixes that so there is no confusion by adding a sentence to some of them. Built the documentation to make sure that it