> From: Alan Lawrence
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:22:13 +
(Regarding some incidentally failing tests)
> Hmm, I still see these passing, both natively on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
> with a cross-build. hf implies --with-float=hard, right?
(Since you mention
On 19 January 2016 at 04:05, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>> This version changes the test cases to fix failures on some platforms, by
>> rewriting the initializers so that they aren't pushed out to the
On 19 January 2016 at 14:22, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/01/16 09:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 19 January 2016 at 04:05, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Alan Lawrence
>>> wrote:
On 19/01/16 09:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 19 January 2016 at 04:05, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This version changes the test cases to fix failures on some platforms, by
rewriting the initializers so that
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> This version changes the test cases to fix failures on some platforms, by
> rewriting the initializers so that they aren't pushed out to the constant
> pool.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * tree-ssa-scopedtables.c
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 09:29 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> Without looking at the patch, ARRAY_REFs can have non-constant indices
>>> which get_ref_base_and_extend handles conservative. You should make
>>> sure to not regress here.
>>
On 05/01/16 07:29, Richard Biener wrote:
On January 4, 2016 8:08:17 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/21/2015 06:13 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This is a respin of patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03266.html and
On 01/05/2016 09:29 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Without looking at the patch, ARRAY_REFs can have non-constant indices
which get_ref_base_and_extend handles conservative. You should make
sure to not regress here.
Thanks for the warning - my understanding is that in such a case,
On 12/24/2015 04:55 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This version changes the test cases to fix failures on some platforms, by
rewriting the initializers so that they aren't pushed out to the constant pool.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-ssa-scopedtables.c (avail_expr_hash): Hash MEM_REF and ARRAY_REF
On 12/21/2015 06:13 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This is a respin of patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03266.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03267.html, which were
"too quickly" approved before concerns with efficiency were pointed out.
I tried to change
On January 4, 2016 8:08:17 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 12/21/2015 06:13 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>> This is a respin of patches
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03266.html and
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03267.html, which were
>> "too
This version changes the test cases to fix failures on some platforms, by
rewriting the initializers so that they aren't pushed out to the constant pool.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-ssa-scopedtables.c (avail_expr_hash): Hash MEM_REF and ARRAY_REF
using get_ref_base_and_extent.
This is a respin of patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03266.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03267.html, which were
"too quickly" approved before concerns with efficiency were pointed out.
I tried to change the hashing just in tree-ssa-dom.c using C++
13 matches
Mail list logo