On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/10/2016 08:20 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Patrick Palka
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch makes it so that a gimplification failure is considered to be
>>> an internal
On 01/10/2016 08:20 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch makes it so that a gimplification failure is considered to be
an internal error under normal circumstances, so that we otherwise avoid
silently generating wrong
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This patch makes it so that a gimplification failure is considered to be
> an internal error under normal circumstances, so that we otherwise avoid
> silently generating wrong code if e.g. a buggy frontend fed us a
>
This patch makes it so that a gimplification failure is considered to be
an internal error under normal circumstances, so that we otherwise avoid
silently generating wrong code if e.g. a buggy frontend fed us a
malformed tree.
The rationale for this change is that it's better to abort compilation