Re: [PATCH 3/4] Also propagate SRA accesses from LHS to RHS (PR 92706)

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for taking so long to reply... > > On Wed, Dec 18 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > > On December 17, 2019 1:43:15 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Jambor > > wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>the previous patch unfortunately does not fix the first testcase in

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Also propagate SRA accesses from LHS to RHS (PR 92706)

Hi, sorry for taking so long to reply... On Wed, Dec 18 2019, Richard Biener wrote: > On December 17, 2019 1:43:15 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Jambor > wrote: >>Hi, >> >>the previous patch unfortunately does not fix the first testcase in PR >>92706 and since I am afraid it might be the important one,

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Also propagate SRA accesses from LHS to RHS (PR 92706)

On December 17, 2019 1:43:15 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Jambor wrote: >Hi, > >the previous patch unfortunately does not fix the first testcase in PR >92706 and since I am afraid it might be the important one, I also >focused on that. The issue here is again total scalarization accesses >clashing with

[PATCH 3/4] Also propagate SRA accesses from LHS to RHS (PR 92706)

Hi, the previous patch unfortunately does not fix the first testcase in PR 92706 and since I am afraid it might be the important one, I also focused on that. The issue here is again total scalarization accesses clashing with those representing accesses in the IL - on another aggregate but here