On 11/14/14 12:19, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Now that LOG_LINKS are per regno, we can distribute them on PARALLELs
just fine. Do so. This makes PARALLELs not lose their LOG_LINKS early
when e.g. a trivial reg-reg move is combined, so that they can be used
in more useful combinations as well.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:37:57PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
This is OK once prereqs are approved.
That is only 3/5 now.
You might consider pushing the two LOG_LINKs related patches forward
independently of the patch to rip apart the PARALLELs. Though I think
that all of the patches are
Now that LOG_LINKS are per regno, we can distribute them on PARALLELs
just fine. Do so. This makes PARALLELs not lose their LOG_LINKS early
when e.g. a trivial reg-reg move is combined, so that they can be used
in more useful combinations as well.
2014-11-14 Segher Boessenkool
