Re: [PATCH 4/7] [D] libiberty: Remove wrongly spec'd mangle rule for encoded integers.

On 04/25/2017 10:50 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 20 April 2017 at 20:58, Iain Buclaw wrote: Hmm, it seems like D compilers until 3 years ago infact used to mangle in this way. Better keep it around then for a little while longer for compatibility. I'll follow-up with an

Re: [PATCH 4/7] [D] libiberty: Remove wrongly spec'd mangle rule for encoded integers.

On 20 April 2017 at 20:58, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > Hmm, it seems like D compilers until 3 years ago infact used to mangle > in this way. Better keep it around then for a little while longer for > compatibility. I'll follow-up with an amendment which doesn't remove > the

Re: [PATCH 4/7] [D] libiberty: Remove wrongly spec'd mangle rule for encoded integers.

On 15 April 2017 at 17:24, Iain Buclaw wrote: > This updates the implementation to reflect a part of the D ABI spec > that has been removed. There should never be a bare integer value > encoded into a template argument list. Integers are always prefixed > by `i' if they

[PATCH 4/7] [D] libiberty: Remove wrongly spec'd mangle rule for encoded integers.

This updates the implementation to reflect a part of the D ABI spec that has been removed. There should never be a bare integer value encoded into a template argument list. Integers are always prefixed by `i' if they are positive or `N' if they are negative. Have verified this indeed is the