On 02/11/2012 12:56 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
FWIW, the mode of flags in users doesn't matter at all on x86, but
which way is correct?
As far as I know, it doesn't matter anywhere. We don't even bother to have
perfect harmony between integer modes in hard registers -- think about what
happens
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/11/2012 12:56 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
FWIW, the mode of flags in users doesn't matter at all on x86, but
which way is correct?
As far as I know, it doesn't matter anywhere. We don't even bother to have
perfect
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch declares CCZmode compatible with CCGOC, CCGO and CCNO modes.
Actually, CCZ mode is not compatible with CCNO mode, since the later
only declares that overflow flag is not set. CCGOC and CCGO declare
garbage in
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch declares CCZmode compatible with CCGOC, CCGO and CCNO modes.
Actually, CCZ mode is not compatible with CCNO mode, since the later
only declares that overflow flag is not set. CCGOC and CCGO declare
garbage
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch declares CCZmode compatible with CCGOC, CCGO and CCNO modes.
Actually, CCZ mode is not compatible with CCNO mode, since the later
only declares that overflow flag is not set. CCGOC and CCGO declare
garbage in
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
Attached patch declares CCZmode compatible with CCGOC, CCGO and CCNO modes.
Actually, CCZ mode is not compatible with CCNO mode, since the later
only declares that overflow flag is not set. CCGOC and CCGO declare
