Re: [PATCH 4.9][AArch64] Backport r214953: Rename [u]int32x1_t to [u]int32_t (resp 16x1, 8x1)in arm_neon.h

2014-09-08 Thread Alan Lawrence
(No regressions in check-gcc or check-g++ on aarch64-none-elf.) --Alan Alan Lawrence wrote: Some manual editing of patch required due to e.g. int64x1 changes present on trunk but not on the 4.9 branch; new patch attached. I've done a quick smoke test of aarch64.exp+simd.exp (check-gcc) and

Re: [PATCH 4.9][AArch64] Backport r214953: Rename [u]int32x1_t to [u]int32_t (resp 16x1, 8x1)in arm_neon.h

2014-09-08 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 5 September 2014 15:28, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote: Some manual editing of patch required due to e.g. int64x1 changes present on trunk but not on the 4.9 branch; new patch attached. I've done a quick smoke test of aarch64.exp+simd.exp (check-gcc) and the g++ neon ABI test,

[PATCH 4.9][AArch64] Backport r214953: Rename [u]int32x1_t to [u]int32_t (resp 16x1, 8x1)in arm_neon.h

2014-09-05 Thread Alan Lawrence
Some manual editing of patch required due to e.g. int64x1 changes present on trunk but not on the 4.9 branch; new patch attached. I've done a quick smoke test of aarch64.exp+simd.exp (check-gcc) and the g++ neon ABI test, as these ought to catch any changes to Neon intrinsics; full testsuite