Re: [PATCH 9/9] ENABLE_CHECKING refactoring: C family front ends

2015-11-04 Thread Mikhail Maltsev
On 11/03/2015 02:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> @@ -14279,8 +14272,9 @@ tsubst_copy (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t >> complain, tree in_decl) >> return tsubst_binary_right_fold (t, args, complain, in_decl); >> >> default: >> - /* We shouldn't get here, but keep going if

Re: [PATCH 9/9] ENABLE_CHECKING refactoring: C family front ends

2015-11-02 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/01/2015 07:58 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: Hi all! This patch was intended to be the last one in this series (but I'll send one more cleanup patch today). It removes ENABLE_CHECKING macros in the C++ front end (and also touches a small piece of common C family code in OpenMP). I could

[PATCH 9/9] ENABLE_CHECKING refactoring: C family front ends

2015-11-01 Thread Mikhail Maltsev
Hi all! This patch was intended to be the last one in this series (but I'll send one more cleanup patch today). It removes ENABLE_CHECKING macros in the C++ front end (and also touches a small piece of common C family code in OpenMP). I could convert most of "#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING" conditions