Hi Hans-Peter,
Sorry if I misinterpret, but it seems a reminder is in order:
magic powers are attached to whome...@gcc.gnu.org accounts in
bugzilla, so when people use them instead of their
whome...@employer.example.com, they are able to close PR's they
haven't created.
Ah - thank you, I did
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, nick clifton wrote:
Also, could you close its duplicates, bugs 36798 and 36966?
Sorry no. I do not actually own these PRs, so I cannot close them. :-(
Sorry if I misinterpret, but it seems a reminder is in order:
magic powers are attached to whome...@gcc.gnu.org accounts
Hi Matt,
Could this patch, or perhaps the much smaller one I attached to bug
35294 be committed to the 4.7 branch?
Yes. Done.
Also, could you close its duplicates, bugs 36798 and 36966?
Sorry no. I do not actually own these PRs, so I cannot close them. :-(
Cheers
Nick
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:56 AM, nick clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
There's also a trivial documentation fix:
[PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation
and a test to exercise the intrinsics:
[PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test
These have both
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, nick clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
There's also a trivial documentation fix:
[PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation
and a test to exercise the intrinsics:
[PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test
These have
Hi Matt,
There's also a trivial documentation fix:
[PATCH 1/2] doc: Correct __builtin_arm_tinsr prototype documentation
and a test to exercise the intrinsics:
[PATCH 2/2] arm: add iwMMXt mmx-2.c test
These have both been checked in.
It turns out that both needed minor updates as some of
Hi Matt, Hi Xinyu,
This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qix...@marvell.com
a number of times in the last year.
Sorry for the long delay in reviewing these patches. Overall they were
fine, with only a few, very minor, formatting issues. I have committed
the entire series of
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:26 AM, nick clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Matt, Hi Xinyu,
This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qix...@marvell.com
a number of times in the last year.
Sorry for the long delay in reviewing these patches. Overall they were
fine, with only a
On 29 May 2012 05:13, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qi x...@marvell.com
a number of times in the last year.
We (One Laptop per Child) need these patches for reasonable iWMMXt support
and performance. Without them, logical and shift
This series was written by Marvell and sent by Xinyu Qi x...@marvell.com
a number of times in the last year.
We (One Laptop per Child) need these patches for reasonable iWMMXt support
and performance. Without them, logical and shift intrinsics cause ICEs,
see PR 35294 and its duplicates 36798
10 matches
Mail list logo
