On 03 Nov 11:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I'd like to ask Jakub for a review of the above two parts, other parts
are OK with a rename (as mentioned above).
Looks ok to me. Where the ICEs discovered just by normal make check or only
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I'd like to ask Jakub for a review of the above two parts, other parts
are OK with a rename (as mentioned above).
Looks ok to me. Where the ICEs discovered just by normal make check or only
with GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE ? If the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've run gcc.dg/torture/* tests with -mavx512bw -mavx512vl -mavx512dq
flags, and got a bunch of fails (mostly in permutes autogen).
Patch below fixes them.
Ok for trunk?
2014-10-30 Ilya Tocar
Hi,
I've run gcc.dg/torture/* tests with -mavx512bw -mavx512vl -mavx512dq
flags, and got a bunch of fails (mostly in permutes autogen).
Patch below fixes them.
Ok for trunk?
2014-10-30 Ilya Tocar ilya.to...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_perm_pshufb): Try vpermq/vpermd