On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/26/2015 03:02 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
GCC avoids
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/26/2015 03:02 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
GCC avoids multi-pointers/dangling-pointers of struct iv by allocating
multiple copies of the structure. This
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/26/2015 03:02 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
GCC avoids multi-pointers/dangling-pointers of struct iv by allocating
multiple copies of the structure. This patch is an obvious fix to the
issue
by managing iv structures in
On 06/26/2015 03:02 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
GCC avoids multi-pointers/dangling-pointers of struct iv by allocating
multiple copies of the structure. This patch is an obvious fix to the issue
by managing iv structures in obstack.
Bootstrap on x86_64, will apply to trunk if no objection.
Hi,
GCC avoids multi-pointers/dangling-pointers of struct iv by allocating
multiple copies of the structure. This patch is an obvious fix to the issue
by managing iv structures in obstack.
Bootstrap on x86_64, will apply to trunk if no objection.
Thanks,
bin
2015-06-26 Bin Cheng
