Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Is the interface between isl/gcc stable enough? If it's not, the work
> "compatible" is definitely confusing for users who don't know isl like
> me. If it is stable, it won't be a problem.
The required version of ISL is documented in GCC's doc/install.texi:
@item ISL Lib
Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >> Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
> >> > are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link
> >> > test uncondi
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>> Richard Biener wrote:
>>> > I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
>>> > are not present in earlier versions and make the t
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Richard Biener wrote:
>> > I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
>> > are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link
>> > test unconditionally.
>> >
>> > Tobias, are th
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
> > are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link
> > test unconditionally.
> >
> > Tobias, are there include files / types / functions we require
> > that are n
Richard Biener wrote:
> I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that
> are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link
> test unconditionally.
>
> Tobias, are there include files / types / functions we require
> that are not available in earlier versions?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Canadian build of arm/aarch64 (and other targets) toolchains are broken
>> because of isl library check. There is below code in top level gcc
>> configuration.
>>
>> { $as_ec
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Canadian build of arm/aarch64 (and other targets) toolchains are broken
> because of isl library check. There is below code in top level gcc
> configuration.
>
> { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for version 0.12 of
>
Hi,
Canadian build of arm/aarch64 (and other targets) toolchains are broken
because of isl library check. There is below code in top level gcc
configuration.
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for version 0.12 of
ISL" >&5
$as_echo_n "checking for version 0.12 of ISL... " >&6; }
