-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 8:18 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:13 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 8:18 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of bin.cheng
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 4:35 PM
To: 'Richard Biener'
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: RE: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
-Original
On 11/05/13 10:13, bin.cheng wrote:
Index: gcc/tree-affine.c
===
--- gcc/tree-affine.c (revision 204117)
+++ gcc/tree-affine.c (working copy)
@@ -874,10 +874,11 @@ debug_aff (aff_tree *val)
fprintf (stderr, \n);
}
-/*
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 10:13, bin.cheng wrote:
Index: gcc/tree-affine.c
===
--- gcc/tree-affine.c (revision 204117)
+++ gcc/tree-affine.c (working copy)
@@
On 11/05/13 11:45, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Yufeng Zhangyufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 10:13, bin.cheng wrote:
Index: gcc/tree-affine.c
===
--- gcc/tree-affine.c (revision 204117)
+++
: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:46 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 11:45, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Yufeng Zhangyufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 10:13, bin.cheng wrote:
Index: gcc/tree-affine.c
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 11:45, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Yufeng Zhangyufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
On 11/05/13 10:13,
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:46 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Simplify address expression in IVOPT
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote
On 10/30/13 14:46, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, bin.chengbin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that IVOPT generates complex address expressions like below for iv
base.
arr_base[0].y
arr[0]
MEM[p+o]
It's even worse for targets support
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that IVOPT generates complex address expressions like below for iv
base.
arr_base[0].y
arr[0]
MEM[p+o]
It's even worse for targets support auto-increment addressing mode because
IVOPT
Hi,
I noticed that IVOPT generates complex address expressions like below for iv
base.
arr_base[0].y
arr[0]
MEM[p+o]
It's even worse for targets support auto-increment addressing mode because
IVOPT adjusts such base expression with +/- step, then creates below:
13 matches
Mail list logo