Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

Thanks, >>>>> bin >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ------ >>>>> From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

rom: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking >>>> DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible >>>> To: Richard Biener

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

Should have replied to gcc-patches list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> bin >>> >>> -- Forwarded message -- >>> From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 >>> Subject: Re:

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

-- Forwarded message -- >> From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> >> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 >> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking >> DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible >>

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 > Subject: Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking > DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible > To: Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> > > On 3/17/16, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Fwd: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

Sorry, Should have replied to gcc-patches list. Thanks, bin -- Forwarded message -- From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:55:04 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermo

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: > > Hi, > > .. > > Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64. Is it OK, not sure if it's GCC 7? > > Hmm. Hi, Thanks for reviewing. > >

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: >> > Hi, >> > .. >> > Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and

Re: [PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > One issue revealed in tree ifcvt is the pass stores/tracks DRs against its > memory references in IR. This causes difficulty in identifying same memory > references appearing in different forms. Given below example:

[PATCH PR69489/01]Improve tree ifcvt by storing/tracking DR against its innermost loop bahavior if possible

Hi, One issue revealed in tree ifcvt is the pass stores/tracks DRs against its memory references in IR. This causes difficulty in identifying same memory references appearing in different forms. Given below example: void foo (int a[], int b[]) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {