On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:06 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-redhat-linux
> > and s390x-redhat-linux.
>
> Agree we should do this FWIW, but as a belt-and-braces fix, would it
> make sense to
Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches writes:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-redhat-linux
> and s390x-redhat-linux.
Agree we should do this FWIW, but as a belt-and-braces fix, would it
make sense to define NULL to nullptr in system.h for all hosts?
Currently we have:
On 25/06/20 13:29 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 16:16 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:14 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On 24/06/20 12:31 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-
>
On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 16:16 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:14 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On 24/06/20 12:31 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-
> > > redhat-linux
> > > and
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:14 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 24/06/20 12:31 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> >Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-redhat-linux
> >and s390x-redhat-linux.
> >
> >Ok for master?
> >
> >---
> >
> >Bootstrap with musl libc fails
On 24/06/20 12:31 +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-redhat-linux
and s390x-redhat-linux.
Ok for master?
---
Bootstrap with musl libc fails with numerous "missing sentinel in
function call" errors. This is because musl defines NULL as 0L
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux, ppc64le-redhat-linux
and s390x-redhat-linux.
Ok for master?
---
Bootstrap with musl libc fails with numerous "missing sentinel in
function call" errors. This is because musl defines NULL as 0L for C++,
but gcc requires sentinel value to be a
