Hi,
on 2024/4/17 17:05, jeevitha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/03/24 7:00 am, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>>> The bogus vsx_splat_ code goes all the way back to GCC 8, so we
>>> should backport this fix. Segher and Ke Wen, can we get an approval
>>> to backport this to all the open release branches (GCC 13,
Hi,
On 18/03/24 7:00 am, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> The bogus vsx_splat_ code goes all the way back to GCC 8, so we
>> should backport this fix. Segher and Ke Wen, can we get an approval
>> to backport this to all the open release branches (GCC 13, 12, 11)?
>> Thanks.
>
> Sure, okay for backporting
Hi,
on 2024/3/16 04:34, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/6/24 3:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> on 2024/3/4 02:55, jeevitha wrote:
>>> The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on
>>> powerpc64le-linux.
>>>
>>> When
On 3/6/24 3:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2024/3/4 02:55, jeevitha wrote:
>> The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux.
>>
>> When we expand the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di function, we were
Hi,
on 2024/3/4 02:55, jeevitha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux.
>
> When we expand the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di function, we were allowing
> immediate
Hi All,
The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux.
When we expand the __builtin_vsx_splat_2di function, we were allowing immediate
value for second operand which causes an
