Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] RISC-V: Part-2: Save/Restore vector registers which need to be preversed

Sorry for that, rebased and send V4 patch, thanks. On 2023/8/31 17:50, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote: Could you rebase the patch again, it seems got some conflict with zcmt which I commit in the past few days... On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:54 AM Lehua Ding wrote: Because functions which

Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] RISC-V: Part-2: Save/Restore vector registers which need to be preversed

Could you rebase the patch again, it seems got some conflict with zcmt which I commit in the past few days... On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:54 AM Lehua Ding wrote: > > Because functions which follow vector calling convention variant has > callee-saved vector reigsters but functions which follow

[PATCH V3 2/3] RISC-V: Part-2: Save/Restore vector registers which need to be preversed

Because functions which follow vector calling convention variant has callee-saved vector reigsters but functions which follow standard calling convention don't have. We need to distinguish which function callee is so that we can tell GCC exactly which vector registers callee will clobber. So I