> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> [Changes from V3:
> :
>> LLVM supports an option -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types that can
>> be used in order to enable or disable the emission of such warnings.
>
> It looks this went in, alas is not covered in
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> [Changes from V3:
:
> LLVM supports an option -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types that can
> be used in order to enable or disable the emission of such warnings.
It looks this went in, alas is not covered in gcc-14/changes.html?
Hi Marek.
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:37:03PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >
>> >> +@opindex Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
>> >> +@item -Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
>> >
>> > This @item should
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:37:03PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> +@opindex Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
> >> +@item -Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
> >
> > This @item should say @r{(C and Objective-C
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> +@opindex Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
>> +@item -Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
>
> This @item should say @r{(C and Objective-C only)}, since the option isn't
> implemented for C++. OK with that change.
Pushed with that
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote:
> +@opindex Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
> +@item -Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types
This @item should say @r{(C and Objective-C only)}, since the option isn't
implemented for C++. OK with that change.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[Changes from V3:
- Previous thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600625.html
- The tests have been augmented to check all six relational
operators. In particular it covers both code paths impacted
by the patch: the equality/inequality and the relational ops.]
GCC
