On 6/19/23 00:56, Robin Dapp wrote:
If the pattern is not allowed to fail, then what code enforces the bias
argument's restrictions? I don't see it in the generic expander code.
I have no ideal since this is just copied from len_load/len_store which is
s390 target dependent stuff.
I have s
>>>If the pattern is not allowed to fail, then what code enforces the bias
>>>argument's restrictions? I don't see it in the generic expander code.
>
> I have no ideal since this is just copied from len_load/len_store which is
> s390 target dependent stuff.
>
> I have sent V7 patch with fixing
uggestion.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-06-17 22:19
To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
CC: richard.sandiford; rguenther; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] VECT: Support LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE} ifn && optabs
On 6/16/23 04:29, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju
On 6/16/23 04:29, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
This patch bootstrap pass on X86, ok for trunk ?
Accoding to comments from Richi, split the first patch to add ifn && optabs
of LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE} only, we don't apply them into vectorizer in this
patch. And also add BIAS a
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
This patch bootstrap pass on X86, ok for trunk ?
Accoding to comments from Richi, split the first patch to add ifn && optabs
of LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE} only, we don't apply them into vectorizer in this
patch. And also add BIAS argument for possible s390's future use.
The descri
