Hello Uroš,
On 15 Aug 20:23, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
(define_insn avx2_avx512bw_ashrvmodemask_name): New.
It looks to me that the macroization is somehow wrong for ashrv. I'd
split the mode iterator to:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
(define_insn avx2_avx512bw_ashrvmodemask_name): New.
It looks to me that the macroization is somehow wrong for ashrv. I'd
split the mode iterator to:
+(define_mode_iterator VI248_AVX512
+ [(V16SI
Hello,
This patch splits VI48_AVX512F iterator into two.
It extends vcvtps2udq,vpbroadcastmb2d patterns as well.
Bootstrapped.
New tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md
(define_mode_iterator VI48_AVX512F): Delete.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch splits VI48_AVX512F iterator into two.
It extends vcvtps2udq,vpbroadcastmb2d patterns as well.
Bootstrapped.
New tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/