On 07/15/2016 08:02 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/14/2016 10:11 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi, Test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347 failed on some targets if the two
memory references are re-written into different forms by IVOPT. This
could
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 10:11 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347 failed on some targets if the two
>> memory references are re-written into different forms by IVOPT. This
>> could be because of various reasons,
On 07/14/2016 10:11 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi, Test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347 failed on some targets if the two
memory references are re-written into different forms by IVOPT. This
could be because of various reasons, for example, auto-increment
addressing mode. Since the address expressions are
Hi,
Test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347 failed on some targets if the two memory
references are re-written into different forms by IVOPT. This could be because
of various reasons, for example, auto-increment addressing mode. Since the
address expressions are of different form, DOM fails to eliminate