Thanks! I will try to improve it.
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 17:44 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 17:38 +0800, Chenghui Pan wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After some attemptions, I think we still ne to check
> > "check_effective_target_loongarch_sx" in vect_int_mod. I wrote some
> > temp
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 17:38 +0800, Chenghui Pan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After some attemptions, I think we still ne to check
> "check_effective_target_loongarch_sx" in vect_int_mod. I wrote some
> temp logics in gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp like this:
>
> diff --git
Hi!
After some attemptions, I think we still ne to check
"check_effective_target_loongarch_sx" in vect_int_mod. I wrote some
temp logics in gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp like this:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index
Thanks for your advice! I will check it out and submit a new version of
patch.
On Sun, 2023-09-24 at 18:05 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 09:15 +0800, Chenghui Pan wrote:
> > LoongArch failed to pass gcc.dg/pr104992.c with -mlsx and -mlasx.
> > This test uses
> > different
On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 09:15 +0800, Chenghui Pan wrote:
> LoongArch failed to pass gcc.dg/pr104992.c with -mlsx and -mlasx. This test
> uses
> different dg-final directives depending on the vect_int_mod result, LoongArch
> SX/ASX supports this operations but corresponding description is not
LoongArch failed to pass gcc.dg/pr104992.c with -mlsx and -mlasx. This test uses
different dg-final directives depending on the vect_int_mod result, LoongArch
SX/ASX supports this operations but corresponding description is not defined in
target-supports.exp. This patch solves the problem above
