Thank you all for the suggestions.
This is first patch where I have just defined a struct libcall_arg_t
which contains
three member rtx, machine_mode and a boolean unsigned_p and will be
used in passing args in
emit_library_[call/value] functions.
Once this patch is approved then i will create
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:29:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 11:22 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > OTOH, you don't need to name Tuple at all... It should not *have* a
> > constructor, since you declared it as class... But you can just use
> > std::tuple here?
> >
> > >
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 11:22 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:03:13PM +0530, Kamlesh Kumar wrote:
> > In this patch series trying to address same by creating a struct Tuple
> > which bundles existing rtx and machine_mode and added one more
> > bool member which
Thanks for working on this.
Kamlesh Kumar via Gcc-patches writes:
> Here is a discussion we did some time ago regarding the defect.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2019-January/227834.html
> please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88877 for testcase
> behavior.
>
> We
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 06:37:57PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I thought of using std::tuple but it requires c++11 support.
I am not sure we always build gcc with c++11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
We do for GCC 11 :-) Since we pay
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 06:37:57PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> I thought of using std::tuple but it requires c++11 support.
> >> I am not sure we always build gcc with c++11?
> >
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
> >
> >We do for GCC 11 :-) Since we pay the price for
On May 25, 2020 6:31:29 PM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:46:02PM +0530, kamlesh kumar wrote:
>> > OTOH, you don't need to name Tuple at all... It should not *have*
>a
>> > constructor, since you declared it as class... But you can just
>use
>> > std::tuple
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:46:02PM +0530, kamlesh kumar wrote:
> > OTOH, you don't need to name Tuple at all... It should not *have* a
> > constructor, since you declared it as class... But you can just use
> > std::tuple here?
>
> I thought of using std::tuple but it requires c++11 support.
>
> OTOH, you don't need to name Tuple at all... It should not *have* a
> constructor, since you declared it as class... But you can just use
> std::tuple here?
I thought of using std::tuple but it requires c++11 support.
I am not sure we always build gcc with c++11?
>
> >
Hi!
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:03:13PM +0530, Kamlesh Kumar wrote:
> In this patch series trying to address same by creating a struct Tuple
> which bundles existing rtx and machine_mode and added one more
> bool member which store unsigned_p which by default is false.
The idea is good. However,
Here is a discussion we did some time ago regarding the defect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2019-January/227834.html
please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88877 for testcase
behavior.
We incorporating below Jakub's suggestion in this patch series.
Jakub wrote:
""
Yeah,
11 matches
Mail list logo
