Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Implement 32- and 64-bit BE handling for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps

On Jan 19, 2018, at 12:32 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > This patch is incorrect for AIX. Which also means that the backport > to GCC 7 branch is incorrect for AIX and must be corrected before the > release. > > AIX assembler does not accept "." (period) as the current

Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Implement 32- and 64-bit BE handling for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps

This patch is incorrect for AIX. Which also means that the backport to GCC 7 branch is incorrect for AIX and must be corrected before the release. AIX assembler does not accept "." (period) as the current address. "b ." is incorrect. And testing for "b ." is incorrect. I am going to try

Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Implement 32- and 64-bit BE handling for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:08:57PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > This patch supercedes and extends > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01479.html, > adding the remaining big-endian support for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps. > This includes 32-bit support for indirect calls and sibling

[PATCH v2, rs6000] Implement 32- and 64-bit BE handling for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps

Hi, This patch supercedes and extends https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01479.html, adding the remaining big-endian support for -mno-speculate-indirect-jumps. This includes 32-bit support for indirect calls and sibling calls, and 64-bit support for indirect calls. The