On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:53:54AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2012-11-16 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* lib/target_suports.exp
(check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
(check_effective_target_has_q_floating_suffix): Ditto.
*
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2012-11-16 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* lib/target_suports.exp
(check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
(check_effective_target_has_q_floating_suffix): Ditto.
*
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch fixes following testsuite failure
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-literals.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/std_fext-numeric-literals.C (test for excess errors)
on targets that don't
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:20:48PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This revision auto-detect support for Q and W suffixes.
2012-11-15 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* lib/target_suports.exp
(check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:20:48PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This revision auto-detect support for Q and W suffixes.
2012-11-15 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* lib/target_suports.exp
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
But -std=c++11 (well, perhaps
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
particular tests, -std=x
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:42:32PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
suffixes through
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
But
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
But -std=c++11
10 matches
Mail list logo