On 26/07/2023 16:26, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/28/23 06:35, Alex Coplan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
> > This is a v2 of the original RFC posted here:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/617878.html
> >
>
On 6/28/23 06:35, Alex Coplan wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
This is a v2 of the original RFC posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/617878.html
Changes since v1:
- Follow the clang behaviour where -pedantic-errors
On 28/06/2023 11:35, Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
> This is a v2 of the original RFC posted here:
Ping. The Objective-C parts have been approved, but the C, C++, and generic bits
need review.
Let me know if
Hi,
This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
This is a v2 of the original RFC posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/617878.html
Changes since v1:
- Follow the clang behaviour where -pedantic-errors means that
__has_extension behaves
