On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:26 AM guojiufu wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-16 09:33, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:42 AM guojiufu
> > wrote:
> >>
> ...
> >> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr101145.inc
> >> >> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr101145.inc
> >> >> new file mode 100644
On 2021-08-16 09:33, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:42 AM guojiufu
wrote:
...
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr101145.inc
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr101145.inc
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..6eed3fa8aca
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++
Jiufu Guo writes:
"Bin.Cheng" writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:42 AM guojiufu
wrote:
Hi,
cut...
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline))
>> +foo_sign (int *__restrict__ a, int *__restrict__ b, TYPE
>> l, >> TYPE n)
>> +{
>> + for (l = L_BASE; n < l; l += C)
>> +
"Bin.Cheng" writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:42 AM guojiufu
wrote:
Hi,
cut...
>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>> +TYPE __attribute__ ((noinline))
>> +foo_sign (int *__restrict__ a, int *__restrict__ b, TYPE l,
>> TYPE n)
>> +{
>> + for (l = L_BASE; n < l; l += C)
>> +*a++ = *b++ + 1;
>> +
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:42 AM guojiufu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to have a ping on this.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/574596.html
Sorry for being late in replying.
>
> BR,
> Jiufu
>
> On 2021-07-15 08:17, guojiufu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would
Hi,
I would like to have a ping on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/574596.html
BR,
Jiufu
On 2021-07-15 08:17, guojiufu via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have an early ping on this with more mail addresses.
BR,
Jiufu.
On 2021-07-07 20:47, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have an early ping on this with more mail addresses.
BR,
Jiufu.
On 2021-07-07 20:47, Jiufu Guo wrote:
Changes since v1:
* Update assumptions for niter, add more test cases check
* Use widest_int/wide_int instead mpz to do +-/
* Move some early check for quick return
For
Changes since v1:
* Update assumptions for niter, add more test cases check
* Use widest_int/wide_int instead mpz to do +-/
* Move some early check for quick return
For code like:
unsigned foo(unsigned val, unsigned start)
{
unsigned cnt = 0;
for (unsigned i = start; i > val; ++i)
cnt++;
