Hi!
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:11:49PM +, Patrick McGehearty wrote:
> The MAX and MIN values have only modest changes since the exponent
> field for IBM 128-bit floating point values is the same size as
> the exponent field for IBM 64-bit floating point values.
This is misleading / wrong /
This patch resolves the failure of powerpc64 long double complex divide
in native ibm long double format after the patch "Practical improvement
to libgcc complex divide".
The new code uses the following macros which are intended to be mapped
to appropriate values according to the underlying
