On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 17:32 +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Exactly, hard wiring the newlib interface into the configury of other
libraries is questionable, but the patch applied to libgfortran goes
beyond hard wiring details of the interface, it hard wires incorrect
details of the interface
On 24 October 2013 17:47, Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com wrote:
I am not sure how we would fix the build issue to allow us to not
hardcode the newlib configure details into the libgfortran configure
script. The linker script that needs to be used to get a good link is
different depending on
On 15 October 2013 22:35, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Would be nice for a build/config person to weigh in or to upgrade and make
bullet proof the system against such failures. My take, by default, the
compile line should do something useful, and that should be enough for
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 15:53 +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Steve,
Can your build be fixed allowing us to back out:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00038.html
?
I'd really like to make some progress on this, while my proposed patch
does resolve the regression introduced by the
On 1 October 2013 12:40, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com wrote:
On 30/09/13 13:40, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Well, I thought this patch would work for me, but it does not. It looks
like gcc_no_link is set to 'no' on my target because, technically, I can
link even if I don't use a
On 15/10/13 12:31, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 1 October 2013 12:40, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com wrote:
On 30/09/13 13:40, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Well, I thought this patch would work for me, but it does not. It looks
like gcc_no_link is set to 'no' on my target because,
Marcus Shawcroft wrote: 2013-10-01 Marcus Shawcroft
marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* configure.ac (AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE): Add for exit() then make
existing AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE dependent on outcome.
Ping^2
For configure patches, I am never quite sure whether they should be
On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
Marcus Shawcroft wrote: 2013-10-01 Marcus Shawcroft
marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* configure.ac (AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE): Add for exit() then make
existing AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE dependent on outcome.
Ping^2
On 1 October 2013 12:40, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com wrote:
Patch attached.
/Marcus
2013-10-01 Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* configure.ac (AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE): Add for exit() then make
existing AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE dependent on outcome.
Ping.
On 30/09/13 13:40, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Well, I thought this patch would work for me, but it does not. It looks
like gcc_no_link is set to 'no' on my target because, technically, I can
link even if I don't use a linker script. I just can't find any
functions.
In which case gating on
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 12:40 +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 30/09/13 13:40, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Well, I thought this patch would work for me, but it does not. It looks
like gcc_no_link is set to 'no' on my target because, technically, I can
link even if I don't use a linker script.
11 matches
Mail list logo
