Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:50:56 + Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > Attached updated patch and test runs on a crosscompiler before > and after the change. > > Now I'm building on real ia64 hardware as > make bootstrap > make -k check > > for both clean and patched trees.

Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

> 'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'. > Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests. You need to run 'make -k check' from the top level build directory. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

On 01/05/2016 02:39 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: 'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'. Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests. You need to run 'make -k check' from the top level build directory. No worries. I had an ia64 box provisioned

Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

On 01/02/2016 04:50 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: I did ran tests only on amd64 host thus the execution failure tests. Attached updated patch and test runs on a crosscompiler before and after the change. Now I'm building on real ia64 hardware as make bootstrap make -k check for

Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:41:14 -0700 Jeff Law wrote: > On 01/05/2016 02:39 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: > >> 'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'. > >> Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests. > > > > You need to run 'make -k

[PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:30:58 -0700 Jeff Law wrote: > > That way gcc will be able to compile glibc's ld: PR/60465 > Egad. PIC on ia64 is a mess. I can kind of see what Richard was trying > to do, but ewww. I don't think it's worth the effort to deep dive into > the PIC support