Hi Kwok,
Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
Oops. I thought exactly the same thing yesterday, but forgot to add
the changes to my commit! Here is the updated version.
I regard(ed) this change as obvious - hence, I missed to reply.
But for completeness: LGTM.
I think it would be useful to commit this
Oops. I thought exactly the same thing yesterday, but forgot to add the
changes to my commit! Here is the updated version.
Kwok
On 06/02/2024 9:03 am, Tobias Burnus wrote:
LGTM. I just wonder whether there should be a value test and not just a
does-not-crash-when-called test for the latter
Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
As previously discussed, this version of the patch adds code to emit a
warning when a directive like this:
!$omp declare target indirect(.true.)
is encountered (i.e. a target directive containing at least one
clause, but no to/enter clause, which appears to violate
Hi
As previously discussed, this version of the patch adds code to emit a
warning when a directive like this:
!$omp declare target indirect(.true.)
is encountered (i.e. a target directive containing at least one clause,
but no to/enter clause, which appears to violate the OpenMP standard).
